Get in touch:

Why does the Deep State of U.S suffering of “Paranoia”?

Why does the Deep State of U.S suffering of “Paranoia”?

The CFR is said to be one of the main factions within the elite power structure often referred to as the “New World Order,” or the Deep State, along with the Trilateral Commission, Bilderberg Group and even the United Nations, which some say poses as a humanitarian front. Financial institutions like the Federal Reserve and World Bank play a large role in the system of degradation and oppression. As it pertains to the actions we took, this will be discussed in greater detail throughout the book. There are other inter-connected secret societies, such as Skull & Bones and the Bohemian Grove. The order said to be at the top of the pyramid is the Illuminati, in collusion with the Vatican, the Zionists and the Jesuits.

Another version suspecting a malignant covert elite ruling a nation or region, is the theory of a deep state. The term coins the belief that soci-ety is not ruled by its official authorities, but, instead, by a secret band of hidden potentates, such as a bureaucratic class controlling everything behind the scenes.

At first, this might seem suspicious, but it’s not hard to imagine that to get a group like this to feel comfortable voicing their concerns or ideas, anonymity and secrecy would be necessary.

All these groups are frequently mentioned when talking about the Deep State, but Bilderberg is the model of what conspiracists are talking about.

Aside from groups and secret societies, almost every multibillionaire is at one time or another thought to be behind heinous secret plans that involve either controlling people or killing off large chunks of people for population control.

Is the concept of a group of wealthy and powerful people meeting in secret to influence global economies and politics practical and rational? Yes. If such a group could agree to meet, keep it secret, and cooperate on their plans, it would make perfect sense to do it.

What would it take to carry out? Not many people would need to know about it. With the resources available to such wealthy and powerful people, it would be possible to cover up the meeting and keep the content secret.

The biggest problem is the word “cooperation.” Our prototype Deep State example of Bilderberg forming—in order to smooth out problems between the nations of North America and Europe, with the goal of encouraging cooperation—might or might not have worked. Because it was secret, we’ll never know what they specifically tried to achieve, but history and human nature weren’t on their side.

To think people will be cooperative simply because they share the trait of being wealthy and powerful is naive. In many cases, their wealth and power came from being uncooperative at best and cutthroat and bloodthirsty at worst.

At what point in history have financial or political competitors ever been able to agree on anything in secret that would benefit both and be applied on a global scale?
The Rothschilds. Rockefellers. The Gates and Soros families. The British Royalty and American political “royalty,” and, of course, the heads of corporations, banks, and other institutions of power and influence. Some would include the Illuminati, the Bilderberg group, the Trilateral Commission, Freemasons, and the “Deep State,” shady and shadowy entities that are the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz story, pulling the levers and strings.

It is nothing short of playing God by a preselected group of people who decided they were gods without public input, notably the richest families on Earth.

Why does the Deep State of U.S suffering of “Paranoia”?

Paranoia – The irrational drive toward dominance that is motivated not by rational self-interest but by fear of being surpassed by a competitor. A para-dox of civilization is that, as relative power increases (along with expansion and exposure), so does paranoia. The dominance over the public state by the deep state is based on (and also generates) paranoia. The paradox that power increases paranoia is seen within states as well as between them. It is not restricted to so-called totalitarian states.

Paranoia – bureaucratic The dominance of bureaucratic policy planning by worst-case scenarios, calling for maximized bureaucratic responses and budgets. This leads to the paranoid style in bureaucratic politics.

Seven years after the infamous Bilderberg group was established.

⦁ JFK’s speech called out the deep state’s secrecy, calling it “repugnant in a free and open society.”
⦁ President Kennedy also spoke of secret societies, secret oaths, secret proceedings, warning that “the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweigh the dangers which are cited to justify it.”
⦁ JFK also addressed matters pertaining to the maintenance of national traditions, an anti-globalist sentiment, the threat of calls for “increased security,” which he explained would be the withholding of factual information from an honest press, which is exactly where we are today in America, though the press is no longer honest if it ever was, the exact opposite.

JFK went on to say, “For we are opposed around the world by monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence, on infiltration instead of invasion, ON SUBVERSION INSTEAD OF ELECTIONS, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.

“It is a system which has conspired vast human and material resources into a building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations. Its preparations are concealed, not published. Hidden from view. Its mistakes are bu-ried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised.

No expenditure [$] is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.” Dominance by any means! One world government, no U.S. sov-ereignty, none for any country. Must conform to the “New World Order.”

The Washington-based Deep State is the largest single institution ever formed. The Executive Office of the President works through the National Security Council in association with portions of the following agencies and departments:

  1. CIA, FBI, and NSA
  2. Department of State
  3. Department of Homeland Security
  4. Department of Defense
  5. Department of Justice and its hundreds of thousands of private contractors
  6. Department of the Treasury and its nearly as plentiful Wall Street private contractors
  7. Judiciary Organizations, including the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which the Supreme Court.

Many of the ostensible kingpins of the “Deep State” intelligence apparatus, as well as their key enablers, are deeply intertwined with the Deep State behind the Deep State. For example, CIA and NSA bosses routinely attend Bilderberq meetings, and often have deep links to the Council on Foreign Relations and/or the Trilateral Commission, two visible organs of the Deep State’s Deep State.

Disgraced General David Petraeus, who was put in charge of the CIA, is a regular Bilderberg attendee and a member of the olobalist Council on Foreign Relations, which has openly expressed its qoal of undermining national sovereignty in favor of “global governance.” When he was done with his government “service,” as with many other supposed “public servants,” he was scooped up by Wall Street investment behemoth KKR.

Now, he spends some of his time shilling for the end of America and the emergence of a European Union-style “North America.” His agenda and trajectory are typical among Deep State swamp creatures.

Another typical Deep State “intelligence” operative deeply intertwined with the Deep State behind the Deep State is Michael Hayden, who has led both the CIA and the NSA. Like Petraeus, Hayden is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and has attended the secretive annual Bilderberg gatherings. He has also publicly expressed sentiments that, in a sane nation governed by the rule of law, would instantly result in his indictment for mass murder.

“We kill people based on metadata,” he bragged at the 2014 Johns Hopkins University’s Foreign Affairs Symposium when explaining how important the illegal spying and collection of metadata was to the “intelligence” bureaucracies’ machinations.

“We kill people based on metadata,” he bragged at the 2014 Johns Hopkins University’s Foreign Affairs Symposium when explaining how important the illegal spying and collection of metadata was to the “intelligence” bureaucracies’ machinations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *